Skip to content
SlateIndex
Ceipal ATSUnified Talent Platform for Hiring, Vendors & Workforce
vs
GoodTimeSmarter Interview Scheduling, Better Experiences
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Ceipal ATS vs GoodTime

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Ceipal ATS is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 1.4 versus 0 for GoodTime.

Choose Ceipal ATS if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.4 vs 0)
  • You need SOC 2 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)

Choose GoodTime if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II (ISAE-3000) or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 42001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Ceipal ATS GoodTime
Visibility score1.4%0%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#50#76
Share of voice0.3%0%
Mentions this run20
Positive in AI answers50%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Ceipal ATS 1%

Ceipal ATS 0pp · GoodTime 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Ceipal ATS leads on 1 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
4.1%
0%
AI Mode
0%
0%
Perplexity
0%
0%
Ceipal ATSGoodTime

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Ceipal ATS ranked higher
0GoodTime ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCeipal ATSGoodTime
ComplianceSOC 2SOC 2 Type II (ISAE-3000), SOC 3, ISO/IEC 42001, GDPR, CCPA
SupportDedicated supportCustomer Help Center
Founded20152016
HeadquartersRochester, NYSan Francisco, California, US
Employees201–50051–200
FundingSeries BSeed (seed/angel)
Best forHealthcare staffing firms, IT and general staffing firms, and enterprise recruiting teamsEnterprise talent teams that run complex panel, multi-day and high-volume interview scheduling.

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ceipal ATS vs GoodTime”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ceipal-ats-vs-goodtime, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.