Ceipal ATSUnified Talent Platform for Hiring, Vendors & Workforce
vs
RadancyThe Talent Acquisition Platform powered by Agentic AI
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Ceipal ATS vs Radancy
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ceipal ATS is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 1.4 versus 0 for Radancy.
Choose Ceipal ATS if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.4 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
Choose Radancy if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HITRUST coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Ceipal ATS | Radancy |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #50 | #80 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Ceipal ATS 0pp · Radancy 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ceipal ATS leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Ceipal ATSRadancy
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Ceipal ATS ranked higher
0Radancy ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Ceipal ATS | Radancy |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | — | Cloud (software as a service) |
| Compliance | SOC 2 | SOC 2 Type 2, HITRUST |
| Support | Dedicated support | — |
| Founded | 2015 | — |
| Headquarters | Rochester, NY | New York City, NY, USA |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series B | Private equity investment from New Mountain Capital · $23M raised |
| Best for | Healthcare staffing firms, IT and general staffing firms, and enterprise recruiting teams | — |
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ceipal ATS vs Radancy”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ceipal-ats-vs-radancy, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.