CeloxisEnterprise project and portfolio management in one execution platform.
vs
CodaThe all-in-one collaborative workspace.
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Celoxis vs Coda
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Celoxis is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 4.6 versus 0 for Coda.
Choose Celoxis if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.6 vs 0)
- You need AICPA SOC 2 Type 2 or EU GDPR or UK GDPR coverage
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
Choose Coda if…
- You need more native integrations (600+ vs 400+)
- You need ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Handles structured tabular data and advanced databases flexibly
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Celoxis | Coda |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.6% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #17 | #47 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Celoxis 0pp · Coda 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Celoxis leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CeloxisCoda
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Celoxis ranked higher
0Coda ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Celoxis | Coda |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $10 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud or on-premise | — |
| Integrations | 400+ | 600+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, AICPA SOC 2 Type 2, EU GDPR, UK GDPR | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 |
| Support | 24x5 support with real people, Standard, Premium and VIP support tiers by plan, Dedicated account manager through rollout | Help center, Superhuman community |
| Founded | 2001 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Pune, India | San Francisco |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Series D · $240M raised |
| Best for | PMOs and project-driven teams that need to manage portfolios, resources, budgets and risks together. | Teams that want docs, spreadsheets and apps in one collaborative workspace. |
Plans side by side
Celoxis
Core$10per Standard user per month, billed annually
Essentials$25per Standard user per month, billed annually
Professional$35per Standard user per month, billed annually
Business$45per Standard user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Coda
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Celoxis
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
Coda
- Handles structured tabular data and advanced databases flexibly
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Celoxis vs Coda”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/celoxis-vs-coda, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.