CeloxisEnterprise project and portfolio management in one execution platform.
vs
GitHubThe home of software development
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Celoxis vs GitHub
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GitHub is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 10.2 versus 4.6 for Celoxis, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Celoxis if…
- You need ISO 27001 or AICPA SOC 2 Type 2 or EU GDPR or UK GDPR coverage
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
Choose GitHub if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.2 vs 4.6)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (48% vs 25% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Celoxis | GitHub |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.6% | 10.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #17 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 2.6% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 48% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Celoxis 0pp · GitHub 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GitHub leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CeloxisGitHub
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Celoxis ranked higher
1GitHub ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Celoxis | GitHub |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | Perplexity | #8 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Celoxis | GitHub |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $10 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud or on-premise | Cloud service (GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and self-hosted GitHub Enterprise Server |
| Integrations | 400+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, AICPA SOC 2 Type 2, EU GDPR, UK GDPR | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Tailored ATO |
| Support | 24x5 support with real people, Standard, Premium and VIP support tiers by plan, Dedicated account manager through rollout | Community support (Free plan), Web-based support (Team plan), Premium support with 24/7 web and phone support and a 30-minute SLA on urgent tickets (Enterprise) |
| Founded | 2001 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Pune, India | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | — | Round led by Sequoia Capital · $350M raised |
| Best for | PMOs and project-driven teams that need to manage portfolios, resources, budgets and risks together. | Development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform. |
Plans side by side
Celoxis
Core$10per Standard user per month, billed annually
Essentials$25per Standard user per month, billed annually
Professional$35per Standard user per month, billed annually
Business$45per Standard user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Celoxis
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
GitHub
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
- Native integration with GitHub repositories and pull requests
- Transparent pricing with a generous free tier
- Best default for teams already using GitHub
- High user satisfaction and review scores
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Celoxis vs GitHub”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/celoxis-vs-github, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.