CeloxisEnterprise project and portfolio management in one execution platform.
vs
MotionThe AI Powered SuperApp for Work
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Celoxis vs Motion
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Celoxis is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 4.6 versus 1.1 for Motion.
Choose Celoxis if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.6 vs 1.1)
- You want a lower entry price ($10 vs $19)
- You need ISO 27001 or AICPA SOC 2 Type 2 or EU GDPR or UK GDPR coverage
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
Choose Motion if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Celoxis | Motion |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.6% | 1.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #17 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Celoxis 0pp · Motion 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Celoxis leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CeloxisMotion
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Celoxis ranked higher
0Motion ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Celoxis | Motion |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $10 per seat / mo | $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Cloud or on-premise | Cloud-hosted SaaS on Google Cloud Platform, with data stored in the United States |
| Integrations | 400+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, AICPA SOC 2 Type 2, EU GDPR, UK GDPR | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | 24x5 support with real people, Standard, Premium and VIP support tiers by plan, Dedicated account manager through rollout | Email support@usemotion.com, Priority Support on Business plan, White Glove Onboarding and Support |
| Founded | 2001 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Pune, India | San Francisco |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | — | Series C2 and B/C combined · $75M raised |
| Best for | PMOs and project-driven teams that need to manage portfolios, resources, budgets and risks together. | Professionals and small teams on the Pro AI plan, and power users and businesses with complex needs on the Business AI plan |
Plans side by side
Celoxis
Core$10per Standard user per month, billed annually
Essentials$25per Standard user per month, billed annually
Professional$35per Standard user per month, billed annually
Business$45per Standard user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Celoxis
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
Motion
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Celoxis vs Motion”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/celoxis-vs-motion, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.