ChaportA better way to talk to your customers
vs
PylonThe Agentic Support Platform
Comparison · Live Chat & AI Support · weekly run Nov 3
Chaport vs Pylon
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Pylon is the stronger AI pick in Live Chat & AI Support: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0 for Chaport.
Choose Chaport if…
- You want a free plan to start
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Pylon if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or GDPR or HIPAA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Chaport | Pylon |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | up+0.7% |
| Rank in Live Chat & AI Support | #41 | #22 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Chaport −0.6pp · Pylon +0.7pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Pylon leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ChaportPylon
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Chaport ranked higher
0Pylon ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Chaport | Pylon |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $29 / mo | $89 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | SaaS | Cloud (AWS, US or EU hosting) |
| Integrations | 4000+ | — |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, GDPR, HIPAA |
| Support | — | Onboarding, Dedicated CSM, Priority support SLAs, Help Center |
| Founded | 2014 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Alhambra, California, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Series B · $51M raised |
| Best for | Startups and SMBs that want simple live chat with messaging channels in one place | B2B support teams handling customers over Slack Connect, Teams and other shared channels |
Plans side by side
Chaport
Free$0month, 2 operators included
Pro$29month billed annually ($39 monthly), 4 operators included
Unlimited$99month billed annually ($129 monthly), unlimited operators
Pylon
Professional$89seat/month, billed annually
Advanced$139seat/month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Chaport
Profile in progress.
Pylon
- Best for B2B SaaS with enterprise Slack/Teams-first support
- Strong for B2B account-centric and high-touch support
- Modern, Slack-Connect and developer-centric B2B support
- Frequently included in shortlists of top B2B SaaS support tools
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Chaport vs Pylon”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/chaport-vs-pylon, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.