Skip to content
SlateIndex
ChatGPTAI Coding Assistants
vs
Sourcegraph CodyThe enterprise coding assistant to understand, fix, and automate your code
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3

ChatGPT vs Sourcegraph Cody

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Sourcegraph Cody is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 7.1 for ChatGPT, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose ChatGPT if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • strong performance on complex tasks like research and deep context
  • general-purpose work

Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 7.1)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
  • Free trial available for 30 days

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric ChatGPT Sourcegraph Cody
Visibility score7.1%7.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Coding Assistants#13#12
Share of voice2.3%3.3%
Mentions this run1216
Positive in AI answers0%0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3ChatGPT 7%

ChatGPT 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Sourcegraph Cody leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
11.5%
0.9%
AI Mode
5.2%
5.2%
Perplexity
4.6%
17%
ChatGPTSourcegraph Cody

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1ChatGPT ranked higher
0Sourcegraph Cody ranked higher
PromptEngineChatGPTSourcegraph Cody
Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms Perplexity#8#14

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionChatGPTSourcegraph Cody
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—$16,000 per seat / mo
Free plan—No
Deployment—Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001
Support—24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support
HeadquartersSan FranciscoSan Francisco, California, US
Employees1,001–5,00051–200
FundingIn progress, seeking up to $20 billion, reported at $1.25 trillion post-moneyLater-stage deal · $225M raised
Best for—Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases

Plans side by side

ChatGPT

Pricing not available.

Sourcegraph Cody

Enterprise$16,000year, minimum annual contract (starting at)
Sourcegraph Cody pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

ChatGPT

  • strong performance on complex tasks like research and deep context
  • general-purpose work
  • coding agent available across ChatGPT, desktop, web, CLI and IDE workflows
  • higher price point
  • access depends on eligible paid plan
  • limited usage on the free plan

Sourcegraph Cody

  • Free trial available for 30 days
  • Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “ChatGPT vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/chatgpt-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.