CheckmkUnified IT Observability for the Hybrid World
vs
LangfuseOpen Source Agent Evals & Observability
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3
Checkmk vs Langfuse
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Langfuse is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 1.4 versus 0 for Checkmk.
Choose Checkmk if…
- You need more native integrations (2000+ vs 100+)
- You need SOC 2 Type I coverage
Choose Langfuse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.4 vs 0)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA-ready region or GDPR coverage
- Discounted cloud pricing for qualifying early-stage startups
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Checkmk | Langfuse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 1.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Observability | #38 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Checkmk 0pp · Langfuse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Langfuse leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CheckmkLangfuse
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Checkmk ranked higher
0Langfuse ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Checkmk | Langfuse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $29 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted or SaaS (Checkmk Cloud) | Langfuse Cloud in US, EU, Japan and HIPAA regions, or self-hosted under the MIT license |
| Integrations | 2000+ | 100+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type I | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA-ready region, GDPR |
| Support | Checkmk Forum (Community), Professional support 8h x 5d (Pro), Professional support 10h x 5d (Ultimate, Cloud), Premium support 24h x 5d (add-on) | Community support via GitHub, In-app support, Private Slack or MS Teams channel on Pro and Enterprise plans, Named lead support engineer on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2007 | — |
| Headquarters | Munich, Germany | — |
| Employees | 201–500 | — |
| Funding | Strategic investment from PSG Equity | Seed · $4M raised |
| Best for | Growing enterprises, managed service providers and global enterprises that run hybrid IT and need full-stack monitoring | Engineering teams building LLM applications and AI agents that want open-source, self-hostable tracing and evaluation |
Plans side by side
Checkmk
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Checkmk
Profile in progress.
Langfuse
- Discounted cloud pricing for qualifying early-stage startups
- Well suited to evaluating and debugging LLM or agent behavior
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Checkmk vs Langfuse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/checkmk-vs-langfuse, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.