LangfuseOpen Source Agent Evals & Observability

New RelicIntelligent Observability resolves issues at scale before they impact your bottom line.

Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3

Langfuse vs New Relic

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

New Relic is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 47.1 versus 1.4 for Langfuse, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose Langfuse if…

AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 42% positive)
You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
You need HIPAA-ready region or GDPR coverage
Discounted cloud pricing for qualifying early-stage startups

Choose New Relic if…

You want the brand AI engines rank higher (47.1 vs 1.4)
You want a lower entry price ($10 vs $29)
You need more native integrations (800+ vs 100+)
You need FedRAMP Moderate (eligible accounts) or HIPAA eligibility or ISO 42001 AI certification coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric	Langfuse	New Relic
Visibility score	1.4%	47.1%
Change vs last week	New	New
Rank in Observability	#27	#3
Share of voice	0.4%	10.7%
Mentions this run	2	63
Positive in AI answers	50%	42%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

Langfuse 0pp · New Relic 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

New Relic leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT

51.3%

AI Mode

43.9%

Perplexity

4.1%

46.1%

LangfuseNew Relic

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

1Langfuse ranked higher

1New Relic ranked higher

Prompt	Engine	Langfuse	New Relic
Best observability platform with AI features	Perplexity	#2	#5
Which observability tools offer annual discounts?	Perplexity	#10	#3

Features, pricing & fit

Dimension	Langfuse	New Relic
Pricing model	Usage-based	Usage-based
Entry price	Free; paid from $29 / mo	Free; paid from $10 / mo
Free plan	Yes	Yes
Deployment	Langfuse Cloud in US, EU, Japan and HIPAA regions, or self-hosted under the MIT license	Cloud-based SaaS
Integrations	100+	800+
Compliance	SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA-ready region, GDPR	SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP Moderate (eligible accounts), HIPAA eligibility, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 AI certification
Support	Community support via GitHub, In-app support, Private Slack or MS Teams channel on Pro and Enterprise plans, Named lead support engineer on Enterprise plans	Ticketed support, 2-hour critical initial response SLA on Pro, 1-hour critical initial response SLA and priority ticket routing on Enterprise
Founded	—	2008
Headquarters	—	San Francisco, CA, United States
Employees	—	1,001–5,000
Funding	Seed · $4M raised	Post-IPO raise (not corroborated by other sources)
Best for	Engineering teams building LLM applications and AI agents that want open-source, self-hostable tracing and evaluation	Engineers responsible for application and system uptime and reliability, and teams that want full-stack observability starting from a free tier.