Cisco DuoSecurity-first IAM that attackers hate and users love.
vs
ZITADELIdentity infrastructure, simplified for you.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Cisco Duo vs ZITADEL
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cisco Duo is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 16.5 versus 1.3 for ZITADEL.
Choose Cisco Duo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.5 vs 1.3)
- You want a lower entry price ($3 vs $100)
- You need FedRAMP High (Duo Federal) or FedRAMP Moderate (Duo Federal) or GovRAMP or TX-RAMP or FIPS 140-3 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose ZITADEL if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 50% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Cisco Duo | ZITADEL |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 16.5% | 1.3% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | up+0.5% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #6 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 4.2% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 14 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 83% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Cisco Duo +0.10000000000000142pp · ZITADEL −1.8pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cisco Duo leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Cisco DuoZITADEL
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Cisco Duo ranked higher
0ZITADEL ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Cisco Duo | ZITADEL |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $3 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $100 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud and self-hosted |
| Integrations | 500+ | — |
| Compliance | FedRAMP High (Duo Federal), FedRAMP Moderate (Duo Federal), GovRAMP, TX-RAMP, FIPS 140-3 | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Technical documentation, Knowledge base, Community | Discord community, GitHub, Documentation, Technical Account Manager (Enterprise) |
| Founded | 2010 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Ann Arbor, MI, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | — | 11–50 |
| Funding | Venture Round | Series A · $16M raised |
| Best for | Organizations from small businesses to enterprises and government that want phishing-resistant MFA and simple IAM. | Developers building applications that need authentication for consumers, businesses or employees, including multi-tenant B2B apps. |
Plans side by side
Cisco Duo
Duo Free$0user/month
Duo Essentials$3user/month
Duo Advantage$6user/month
Duo Premier$9user/month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Cisco Duo
- Low-friction, reliable MFA
- Zero Trust device trust and endpoint visibility
- Phishing-resistant MFA, SSO, and device trust
- Free tier for up to 10 users
- Highest PeerSpot rating among access-management products
ZITADEL
- Free cloud tier with core features like MFA and OIDC
- Cloud-native, open-source IAM with strong multi-tenancy and audit logging
- Clear usage limits and published monthly pricing
- Good for developer-focused IAM
- Cloud-based IAM without managing infrastructure
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cisco Duo vs ZITADEL”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cisco-duo-vs-zitadel, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.