OktaSecuring every identity, from AI to human
vs
ZITADELIdentity infrastructure, simplified for you.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Okta vs ZITADEL
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 1.3 for ZITADEL, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Okta if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 1.3)
- You want a lower entry price ($6 vs $100)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
Choose ZITADEL if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 39% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Okta | ZITADEL |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 56.9% | 1.3% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.9% | up+0.5% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #2 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 12.2% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 38 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 39% | 83% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Okta −3.3000000000000043pp · ZITADEL −1.8pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
OktaZITADEL
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Okta ranked higher
1ZITADEL ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Okta | ZITADEL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which identity and access management platform has transparent pricing? | ChatGPT | #5 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Okta | ZITADEL |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $6 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $100 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud and self-hosted |
| Integrations | 8000+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans | Discord community, GitHub, Documentation, Technical Account Manager (Enterprise) |
| Founded | 2009 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 11–50 |
| Funding | IPO | Series A · $16M raised |
| Best for | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. | Developers building applications that need authentication for consumers, businesses or employees, including multi-tenant B2B apps. |
Plans side by side
Okta
Starter$6user/month, billed annually
Core Essentials$14user/month, billed annually
Essentials$17user/month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustomuser/month
EnterpriseCustomuser/month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
ZITADEL
- Free cloud tier with core features like MFA and OIDC
- Cloud-native, open-source IAM with strong multi-tenancy and audit logging
- Clear usage limits and published monthly pricing
- Good for developer-focused IAM
- Cloud-based IAM without managing infrastructure
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Okta vs ZITADEL”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/okta-vs-zitadel, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.