Skip to content
SlateIndex
OktaSecuring every identity, from AI to human
vs
ZITADELIdentity infrastructure, simplified for you.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Okta vs ZITADEL

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 1.3 for ZITADEL, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Okta if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 1.3)
  • You want a lower entry price ($6 vs $100)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)

Choose ZITADEL if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 39% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Okta ZITADEL
Visibility score56.9%1.3%
Change vs last weekdown−0.9%up+0.5%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#2#27
Share of voice12.2%0.4%
Mentions this run381
Positive in AI answers39%83%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Okta 57%

Okta −3.3000000000000043pp · ZITADEL −1.8pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
68.4%
3.9%
AI Mode
60%
2.6%
Perplexity
53.9%
0%
OktaZITADEL

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0Okta ranked higher
1ZITADEL ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionOktaZITADEL
Pricing modelPer seatUsage-based
Entry price$6 per seat / moFree; paid from $100 / mo
Free planNo · 30-day trialYes
DeploymentCloud (SaaS)Cloud and self-hosted
Integrations8000+—
ComplianceISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II
SupportOnline support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success PlansDiscord community, GitHub, Documentation, Technical Account Manager (Enterprise)
Founded20092020
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesSan Francisco, CA, United States
Employees5,000+11–50
FundingIPOSeries A · $16M raised
Best forOrganizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform.Developers building applications that need authentication for consumers, businesses or employees, including multi-tenant B2B apps.

Plans side by side

Okta

Starter$6user/month, billed annually
Core Essentials$14user/month, billed annually
Essentials$17user/month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustomuser/month
EnterpriseCustomuser/month
Okta pricing

ZITADEL

Free$0month
Pro$100month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
ZITADEL pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Okta

  • Market-leading IAM platform
  • Independent, cloud-native identity platform
  • Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
  • Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
  • Strong security effectiveness

    ZITADEL

    • Free cloud tier with core features like MFA and OIDC
    • Cloud-native, open-source IAM with strong multi-tenancy and audit logging
    • Clear usage limits and published monthly pricing
    • Good for developer-focused IAM
    • Cloud-based IAM without managing infrastructure

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Okta vs ZITADEL”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/okta-vs-zitadel, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.