ClearMLThe Infrastructure Platform For AI Builders
vs
FeastThe Open Source Feature Store for Machine Learning
Comparison · MLOps Platforms · weekly run Nov 2
ClearML vs Feast
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
ClearML is the stronger AI pick in MLOps Platforms: it has a visibility score of 20.6 versus 2 for Feast, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose ClearML if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (20.6 vs 2)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- open-source flexibility
- transparent, clear pricing with a free self-hosted tier
Choose Feast if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 43% positive)
- Connects with data lakes and warehouses for consistent data retrieval
- Open-source, portable foundation option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | ClearML | Feast |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 20.6% | 2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in MLOps Platforms | #8 | #29 |
| Share of voice | 4.5% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 30 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 43% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ClearML 0pp · Feast 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
ClearML leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClearMLFeast
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1ClearML ranked higher
0Feast ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | ClearML | Feast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top MLOps platform vendors | Perplexity | #12 | #18 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ClearML | Feast |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Hosted servers, self-hosted, or a managed service in a VPC, on-premises (including air-gapped) or hybrid. | Self-hosted; Kubernetes, and AWS Lambda (alpha) |
| Support | Dedicated Slack channel (Scale), Standard SLA (Scale), White-glove support with custom SLA (Enterprise), Professional services (Enterprise) | Community Slack, Documentation |
| Founded | 2016 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | — |
| Employees | 11–50 | — |
| Funding | Series B (reported for parent Allegro AI, unverified, led by New Enterprise Associates) · $16M raised | — |
| Best for | Individuals, researchers and small teams on the free plan, growing AI teams on Pro, and enterprises running GPU clusters for multiple large projects. | Machine learning and AI teams that need the same feature definitions for training and inference. |
Plans side by side
ClearML
Community$0month
Pro$15user/month + usage
ScaleCustomcustom quote
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
Feast
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ClearML
- open-source flexibility
- transparent, clear pricing with a free self-hosted tier
- end-to-end MLOps coverage in one platform
- GPU orchestration and pipeline automation
- affordable choice for cost-conscious teams
Feast
- Connects with data lakes and warehouses for consistent data retrieval
- Open-source, portable foundation option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ClearML vs Feast”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clearml-vs-feast, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.