ClerkAuthentication and user management for modern web apps
vs
Transmit SecurityCustomer identity and access management with fraud prevention in one platform
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Clerk vs Transmit Security
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Clerk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 3.1 versus 0.7 for Transmit Security.
Choose Clerk if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.1 vs 0.7)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 50% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA or GDPR (EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework) or CCPA coverage
Choose Transmit Security if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Innovative player focused on passwordless authentication
- Risk-based fraud prevention capabilities
- Modern platform for customer-facing identity experiences
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clerk | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.1% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.6% | up+0.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #22 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 1.3% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clerk +0.6000000000000001pp · Transmit Security 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Clerk leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClerkTransmit Security
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clerk ranked higher
0Transmit Security ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clerk | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $25 / mo | $50,000 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | SaaS |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, GDPR (EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework), CCPA | — |
| Support | Community Discord, Email support, Priority support, Dedicated technical account manager | Enterprise SLA with premium support |
| Founded | 2019 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series C · $101M raised | Series A · $543M raised |
| Best for | Developers building React and Next.js apps who want prebuilt auth and user management, including B2B SaaS needing organizations and SSO | Large enterprises such as banks and insurers needing combined customer identity and fraud prevention |
Plans side by side
Clerk
Hobby$0month
Pro$25month ($20/mo billed annually)
Business$300month ($250/mo billed annually)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, billed annually
Transmit Security
Full Mosaic Platform$200,000year for 100K Monthly Active Users (starting at)
Mosaic for Identity$100,000year for 100K Monthly Active Users (starting at)
Mosaic for Identity Fraud and Threat Detection and Response$100,000year for 10M Logins (starting at)
Mosaic for Identity Verification$50,000year for 100K ID Checks (starting at)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clerk
- Free user management up to 1,000,000 MAUs
- Clear, modular per-connection pricing
- Rapid development and developer experience
- Expanded support for B2B organizations and multi-tenancy
- Good fit for rapid MVP builds
Transmit Security
- Innovative player focused on passwordless authentication
- Risk-based fraud prevention capabilities
- Modern platform for customer-facing identity experiences
- Noted by Gartner for specialized fraud prevention and CIAM architectures
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clerk vs Transmit Security”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clerk-vs-transmit-security, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.