Clerk vs Okta
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 3.1 for Clerk, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.
Choose Clerk if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 39% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA or GDPR (EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework) or CCPA coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Okta if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 3.1)
- You want a lower entry price ($6 vs $25)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clerk | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.1% | 56.9% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.6% | down−0.9% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #22 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 1.3% | 12.2% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clerk +0.6000000000000001pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Clerk | Okta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top identity and access management platform options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #8 | #1 |
| Top identity and access management platform options for B2B SaaS companies | AI Mode | #4 | #2 |
| Top identity and access management platform options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #6 | #9 |
| Best identity and access management platform for startups | Perplexity | #7 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clerk | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $25 / mo | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 8000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, GDPR (EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework), CCPA | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 |
| Support | Community Discord, Email support, Priority support, Dedicated technical account manager | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans |
| Founded | 2019 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series C · $101M raised | IPO |
| Best for | Developers building React and Next.js apps who want prebuilt auth and user management, including B2B SaaS needing organizations and SSO | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. |
Plans side by side
Clerk
Okta
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clerk
- Free user management up to 1,000,000 MAUs
- Clear, modular per-connection pricing
- Rapid development and developer experience
- Expanded support for B2B organizations and multi-tenancy
- Good fit for rapid MVP builds
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clerk vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clerk-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.