ClineAI Coding, Open Source and Open Choice
vs
TabbyOpensource, self-hosted AI coding assistant
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Cline vs Tabby
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cline is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 0.3 for Tabby, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Cline if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 0.3)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Open-source with bring-your-own API key
- Granular model control and choice of models
Choose Tabby if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 54% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- privacy and self-hosting
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Cline | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.3% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #16 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 2.6% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 54% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Cline 0pp · Tabby 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cline leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClineTabby
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Cline ranked higher
0Tabby ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Cline | Tabby |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | ChatGPT | #7 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Cline | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Runs in your editor, terminal or own apps, with local or cloud AI models, and VPC deployments on Enterprise. | Self-hosted on-premises or in the cloud, with no external DBMS or cloud services required |
| Support | Community support for the open-source version, Priority and dedicated support on Enterprise, SLA on Enterprise | Community Slack, Email support, Dedicated Slack channel |
| Founded | — | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Seed · $32M raised | Seed · $7M raised |
| Best for | Individual developers and teams who want an open-source agent with their own provider keys, and organizations that need SSO, audit logs and team management on Enterprise. | Developers and teams who want a self-hosted, open-source alternative to GitHub Copilot and need to keep control of their code and infrastructure. |
Plans side by side
Tabby
Community$0per month, free open source
Team$19per seat per month
EnterpriseCustomcustom, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Cline
- Open-source with bring-your-own API key
- Granular model control and choice of models
- Reliable handling of large codebase modifications
- Free, flexible setup
- Fits strict privacy and compliance needs with approved models
- Team must pay model-token API costs
Tabby
- privacy and self-hosting
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cline vs Tabby”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cline-vs-tabby, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.