Skip to content
SlateIndex
ClineAI Coding, Open Source and Open Choice
vs
CursorAI Coding Agent for Building Ambitious Software
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3

Cline vs Cursor

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 5.3 for Cline, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Cline if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (54% vs 53% positive)
  • Open-source with bring-your-own API key
  • Granular model control and choice of models
  • Reliable handling of large codebase modifications

Choose Cursor if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 5.3)
  • You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Cline Cursor
Visibility score5.3%67.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Coding Assistants#16#2
Share of voice2.6%13.6%
Mentions this run1365
Positive in AI answers54%53%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Cline 5%

Cline 0pp · Cursor 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3%
78.7%
AI Mode
4.6%
73.5%
Perplexity
8.3%
50.9%
ClineCursor

Head to head in AI answers

12 engine answers name both brands

0Cline ranked higher
12Cursor ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionClineCursor
Pricing modelUsage-based—
Entry priceContact sales—
Free planYes—
DeploymentRuns in your editor, terminal or own apps, with local or cloud AI models, and VPC deployments on Enterprise.Desktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agents
Compliance—AIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type II
SupportCommunity support for the open-source version, Priority and dedicated support on Enterprise, SLA on EnterpriseCustomer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise plan
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, United States—
Employees11–50501–1,000
FundingSeed · $32M raisedFunding round at $9.9B valuation
Best forIndividual developers and teams who want an open-source agent with their own provider keys, and organizations that need SSO, audit logs and team management on Enterprise.Individual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls.

Plans side by side

Cline

Open Source$0free for individual developers
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Cline pricing

Cursor

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Cline

  • Open-source with bring-your-own API key
  • Granular model control and choice of models
  • Reliable handling of large codebase modifications
  • Free, flexible setup
  • Fits strict privacy and compliance needs with approved models
  • Team must pay model-token API costs

Cursor

  • Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
  • High user satisfaction and momentum
  • Top overall pick for professional developers
  • Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
  • Free tier to try it
  • Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
  • Free Hobby plan has limited usage

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cline vs Cursor”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cline-vs-cursor, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.