CloudBeesThe governed software delivery solution for the agentic era
vs
Fly.ioLaunch computers for agents, code sandboxes, and your next app.
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
CloudBees vs Fly.io
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CloudBees is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 0 for Fly.io.
Choose CloudBees if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 0)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Enterprise scaling, governance, and support for Jenkins
- Deep enterprise Jenkins foundation with advanced software delivery management
Choose Fly.io if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (BAA pre-signed on HIPAA package) coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CloudBees | Fly.io |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #20 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CloudBees 0pp · Fly.io 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CloudBees leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CloudBeesFly.io
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0CloudBees ranked higher
0Fly.io ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CloudBees | Fly.io |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $38 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Hybrid and multi-cloud environments | Operated by Fly.io on its own hardware across 18+ regions worldwide, deployed from GitHub or the fly CLI. |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (BAA pre-signed on HIPAA package) |
| Support | Support team | Community support (free), Paid Standard, Premium and Enterprise support tiers, Dedicated Slack channel on Premium and Enterprise |
| Founded | 2010 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, CA, United States | Chicago, Illinois, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series F, with Goldman Sachs Asset Management private credit clients leading | Seed · $136M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises that need to govern CI/CD and agentic coding across mixed toolchains | Developers and teams that want to ship apps, AI agents and code sandboxes without managing infrastructure. |
Plans side by side
CloudBees
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CloudBees
- Enterprise scaling, governance, and support for Jenkins
- Deep enterprise Jenkins foundation with advanced software delivery management
- Broad plugin ecosystem via Jenkins
- Recognised as a strong CI/CD vendor to evaluate
- Jenkins has been edged out in new adoptions by native CI/CD tools
Fly.io
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CloudBees vs Fly.io”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cloudbees-vs-fly-io, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.