Skip to content
SlateIndex
CloudBeesThe governed software delivery solution for the agentic era
vs
SemaphoreThe CI built for coding agents: fast, affordable, and enterprise-ready.
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3

CloudBees vs Semaphore

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Semaphore is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 6.4 versus 2.8 for CloudBees, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose CloudBees if…

  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Enterprise scaling, governance, and support for Jenkins
  • Deep enterprise Jenkins foundation with advanced software delivery management
  • Broad plugin ecosystem via Jenkins

Choose Semaphore if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.4 vs 2.8)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (40% vs 33% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 coverage
  • predictable, transparent usage pricing

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric CloudBees Semaphore
Visibility score2.8%6.4%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in CI/CD#20#14
Share of voice1%1.9%
Mentions this run611
Positive in AI answers33%40%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3CloudBees 3%

CloudBees 0pp · Semaphore 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Semaphore leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
2.2%
3.9%
AI Mode
4.6%
8.2%
Perplexity
1.7%
7.2%
CloudBeesSemaphore

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

2CloudBees ranked higher
0Semaphore ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCloudBeesSemaphore
Pricing model—Usage-based
Entry price—Free; paid from $0.003 / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentHybrid and multi-cloud environmentsOpen source, cloud, hybrid or enterprise deployment
Compliance—SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022
SupportSupport teamFree help with account setup, projects and Git integration, Paid Basic, Priority Response, SLA Standard and SLA Premium support plans, On-demand engineering access in blocks of hours
Founded20102009
HeadquartersSan Jose, CA, United StatesNovi Sad, Serbia
Employees501–1,00011–50
FundingSeries F, with Goldman Sachs Asset Management private credit clients leadingPE round, Cypress Ridge Capital
Best forLarge enterprises that need to govern CI/CD and agentic coding across mixed toolchainsTeams that want fast, low-cost CI/CD with pay-as-you-go pricing and the option to self-host open source.

Plans side by side

CloudBees

Pricing not available.

Semaphore

Ubuntu ARM 2vCPU$0.003minute
Ubuntu ARM 4vCPU$0.006minute
Ubuntu ARM 8vCPU$0.012minute
Ubuntu x64 2vCPU$0.008minute
Ubuntu x64 4vCPU$0.015minute
MacOS 4vCPU$0.09minute
Self-Hosted (any machine)$0.003minute
Semaphore pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

CloudBees

  • Enterprise scaling, governance, and support for Jenkins
  • Deep enterprise Jenkins foundation with advanced software delivery management
  • Broad plugin ecosystem via Jenkins
  • Recognised as a strong CI/CD vendor to evaluate
  • Jenkins has been edged out in new adoptions by native CI/CD tools

Semaphore

  • predictable, transparent usage pricing
  • free full-functionality enterprise tier for small teams and startups
  • highest G2 review rating among CI/CD tools (4.7/5)
  • low-friction integration for GitHub repositories
  • scaling costs
  • complex matrix requirements
  • security track record concerns

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “CloudBees vs Semaphore”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cloudbees-vs-semaphore, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.