CloudBeesThe governed software delivery solution for the agentic era
vs
TeamCityCI/CD
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
CloudBees vs TeamCity
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
TeamCity is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 7.2 versus 2.8 for CloudBees, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose CloudBees if…
- Enterprise scaling, governance, and support for Jenkins
- Deep enterprise Jenkins foundation with advanced software delivery management
- Broad plugin ecosystem via Jenkins
- Recognised as a strong CI/CD vendor to evaluate
Choose TeamCity if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.2 vs 2.8)
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CloudBees | TeamCity |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 7.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #20 | #13 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 2.6% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 16 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CloudBees 0pp · TeamCity 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
TeamCity leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CloudBeesTeamCity
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
0CloudBees ranked higher
3TeamCity ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | CloudBees | TeamCity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top CI/CD tool vendors | ChatGPT | #13 | #7 |
| Official website of the top CI/CD tool vendors | AI Mode | #9 | #8 |
| Who makes the most used CI/CD tool? | AI Mode | #5 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CloudBees | TeamCity |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Hybrid and multi-cloud environments | On-premises, single-tenant cloud, or hybrid; TeamCity Cloud is offered as a hosted option. |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Support team | — |
| Founded | 2010 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, CA, United States | Prague, Czech Republic (registered); Amsterdam (regional HQ) |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series F, with Goldman Sachs Asset Management private credit clients leading | — |
| Best for | Large enterprises that need to govern CI/CD and agentic coding across mixed toolchains | — |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CloudBees
- Enterprise scaling, governance, and support for Jenkins
- Deep enterprise Jenkins foundation with advanced software delivery management
- Broad plugin ecosystem via Jenkins
- Recognised as a strong CI/CD vendor to evaluate
- Jenkins has been edged out in new adoptions by native CI/CD tools
TeamCity
- powerful CI/CD server for complex enterprise builds
- best for enterprise and hybrid or on-premises environments
- straightforward annual offer with two months free
- discounts usually negotiated rather than automatically applied
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CloudBees vs TeamCity”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cloudbees-vs-teamcity, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.