Coassemble vs D2L Brightspace
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
D2L Brightspace is the stronger AI pick in Learning Management: it has a visibility score of 16.4 versus 1.2 for Coassemble.
Choose Coassemble if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
Choose D2L Brightspace if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.4 vs 1.2)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27701 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC reports or CSA STAR or TX-RAMP coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Strong for learning outcomes and accessibility
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Coassemble | D2L Brightspace |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 16.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Learning Management | #36 | #8 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 4.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 24 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 67% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Coassemble 0pp · D2L Brightspace 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
D2L Brightspace leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Coassemble | D2L Brightspace |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $2,500 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Hosted with US, EU, UK or AU data residency; self-hosting or dedicated servers on request | Cloud-hosted, with customer data replicated to a disaster recovery data center |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC reports, CSA STAR, TX-RAMP |
| Support | Knowledge base, AI support, Priority support on the Scale plan, Technical support and dedicated account management on the Strategic Partner plan | Customer support services, Onboarding services, Migration and training, Learning course design services |
| Founded | 2016 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Newcastle West, New South Wales, Australia | Kitchener, Ontario, Canada |
| Employees | 11–50 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series A · $7M raised | Series B |
| Best for | Engineering and product teams that want training built into their own apps, intranets and Slack | Schools, colleges, businesses, training organizations, associations and government bodies that run online, hybrid or in-person learning and want AI and analytics in the same platform. |
Plans side by side
Coassemble
D2L Brightspace
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Coassemble
Profile in progress.
D2L Brightspace
- Strong for learning outcomes and accessibility
- Recommended for schools and universities
- Benchmark platform in higher education and K-12
- Recommended for enterprise and professional learning
- Shortlisted in 2026 market research recommendations
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Coassemble vs D2L Brightspace”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/coassemble-vs-d2l-brightspace, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.