CoassembleThe API-first training platform
vs
Open edXThe leading global open-source teaching and learning platform.
Comparison · Learning Management · weekly run Nov 3
Coassemble vs Open edX
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Coassemble is the stronger AI pick in Learning Management: it has a visibility score of 1.2 versus 1.2 for Open edX.
Choose Coassemble if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
Choose Open edX if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Highly scalable
- Open-source alternative to proprietary LMS platforms
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Coassemble | Open edX |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Learning Management | #36 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 67% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Coassemble 0pp · Open edX 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Coassemble leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CoassembleOpen edX
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Coassemble ranked higher
0Open edX ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Coassemble | Open edX |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $2,500 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Hosted with US, EU, UK or AU data residency; self-hosting or dedicated servers on request | Self-hosted on the organization's own infrastructure, or managed by Open edX hosting providers. A temporary sandbox instance is also offered for evaluation. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | — |
| Support | Knowledge base, AI support, Priority support on the Scale plan, Technical support and dedicated account management on the Strategic Partner plan | Community discussion forum at discuss.openedx.org, Managed services from Open edX hosting providers |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Newcastle West, New South Wales, Australia | Cambridge, MA, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series A · $7M raised | — |
| Best for | Engineering and product teams that want training built into their own apps, intranets and Slack | Universities, government and NGO education programs, and businesses that want a customizable learning platform they control without licensing fees. |
Plans side by side
Coassemble
Build$2,500/yr billed annually (or $250/mo)
Scale$5,000/yr billed annually (or $500/mo)
Partner$20,000/yr billed annually, from (or from $2,000/mo)
Open edX
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Coassemble
Profile in progress.
Open edX
- Highly scalable
- Open-source alternative to proprietary LMS platforms
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Coassemble vs Open edX”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/coassemble-vs-open-edx, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.