CodaThe all-in-one collaborative workspace.
vs
LinearThe product development system for teams and agents
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Coda vs Linear
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Linear is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 7.9 versus 0 for Coda.
Choose Coda if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- Handles structured tabular data and advanced databases flexibly
Choose Linear if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.9 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or HIPAA (BAA available) or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Coda | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 7.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #47 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 2% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 54% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Coda 0pp · Linear 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Linear leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CodaLinear
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Coda ranked higher
0Linear ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Coda | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-hosted SaaS; workspace data can be stored in the European Union or the United States |
| Integrations | 600+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA available), ISO/IEC 27001:2022 |
| Support | Help center, Superhuman community | Priority support (Enterprise plan), Account manager (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2014 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | — |
| Funding | Series D · $240M raised | Series C · $134M raised |
| Best for | Teams that want docs, spreadsheets and apps in one collaborative workspace. | Product and engineering teams that build software and want humans and AI agents working in one shared system |
Plans side by side
Coda
Pricing not available.
Linear
Free$0free for everyone
Basic$10per user/month, billed yearly
Business$16per user/month, billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomannual billing only
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Coda
- Handles structured tabular data and advanced databases flexibly
Linear
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
- Transparent, scalable pricing tiers
- Good fit for SaaS and tech product teams
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Coda vs Linear”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/coda-vs-linear, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.