CodacyCode Quality & Security for AI-Assisted Engineering
vs
CodeRabbitGovernance & Control for Agentic Development
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Codacy vs CodeRabbit
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CodeRabbit is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 1.2 versus 0.4 for Codacy, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Codacy if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) coverage
Choose CodeRabbit if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.2 vs 0.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Codacy | CodeRabbit |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #35 | #24 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Codacy 0pp · CodeRabbit 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CodeRabbit leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CodacyCodeRabbit
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Codacy ranked higher
1CodeRabbit ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Codacy | CodeRabbit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which AI coding assistant tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #6 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Codacy | CodeRabbit |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo | $24 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted | SaaS; self-hosting and company-selected SaaS regions available on Enterprise |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR |
| Support | Standard support via email and in-app chat, Priority support via screen sharing and video chat, Dedicated Customer Success Manager and Solutions Engineer on Business plan | Enterprise plan: support SLA, dedicated customer success, and technical enablement |
| Founded | 2012 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Lisbon, Portugal | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B · $28M raised | Series C · $200M raised |
| Best for | Fast-paced engineering teams building fast-growing codebases | Engineering teams merging high volumes of pull requests, including AI-generated code from coding agents |
Plans side by side
Codacy
Developer$0per dev/mth, free forever
Team$18per dev/mth, yearly billing (from $21 monthly)
BusinessCustomcustom, per dev/mth, billed annually
CodeRabbit
Essentials$24per user/mo, billed annually
Team$48per user/mo, billed annually
Advanced$72per user/mo, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, contact sales
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codacy vs CodeRabbit”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codacy-vs-coderabbit, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.