Codacy vs Cursor
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 0.4 for Codacy, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Codacy if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) coverage
Choose Cursor if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 0.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (53% vs 0% positive)
- You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Codacy | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 67.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #35 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 13.6% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 65 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 53% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Codacy 0pp · Cursor 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Codacy | Cursor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which AI coding assistant tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #6 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Codacy | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted | Desktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agents |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) | AIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Standard support via email and in-app chat, Priority support via screen sharing and video chat, Dedicated Customer Success Manager and Solutions Engineer on Business plan | Customer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2012 | — |
| Headquarters | Lisbon, Portugal | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series B · $28M raised | Funding round at $9.9B valuation |
| Best for | Fast-paced engineering teams building fast-growing codebases | Individual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls. |
Plans side by side
Codacy
Cursor
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Codacy
Profile in progress.
Cursor
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
- High user satisfaction and momentum
- Top overall pick for professional developers
- Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
- Free tier to try it
- Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
- Free Hobby plan has limited usage
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codacy vs Cursor”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codacy-vs-cursor, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.