CodacyCode Quality & Security for AI-Assisted Engineering
vs
ContinuePioneering open-source coding agent
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Codacy vs Continue
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Continue is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 1.7 versus 0.4 for Codacy.
Choose Codacy if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
Choose Continue if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.7 vs 0.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Codacy | Continue |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 1.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #35 | #22 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.8% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Codacy 0pp · Continue 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Continue leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CodacyContinue
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Codacy ranked higher
0Continue ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Codacy | Continue |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted | Open-source editor extensions and CLI, with self-hosted and local model use supported |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) | — |
| Support | Standard support via email and in-app chat, Priority support via screen sharing and video chat, Dedicated Customer Success Manager and Solutions Engineer on Business plan | — |
| Founded | 2012 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Lisbon, Portugal | San Francisco, CA, USA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B · $28M raised | Seed (SAFEs), led by Heavybit · $5M raised |
| Best for | Fast-paced engineering teams building fast-growing codebases | — |
Plans side by side
Codacy
Developer$0per dev/mth, free forever
Team$18per dev/mth, yearly billing (from $21 monthly)
BusinessCustomcustom, per dev/mth, billed annually
Continue
Pricing not available.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codacy vs Continue”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codacy-vs-continue, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.