CodacyCode Quality & Security for AI-Assisted Engineering
vs
Kilo CodeOpen source AI coding agent in IDE, CLI and Cloud
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Codacy vs Kilo Code
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Kilo Code is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 0.4 for Codacy.
Choose Codacy if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) coverage
Choose Kilo Code if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 0.4)
- You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $18)
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Codacy | Kilo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 5.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #35 | #17 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 1.1% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Codacy 0pp · Kilo Code 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Kilo Code leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CodacyKilo Code
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Codacy ranked higher
0Kilo Code ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Codacy | Kilo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted | IDE, CLI and cloud; local models supported; the open-source code can be self-hosted |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) | — |
| Support | Standard support via email and in-app chat, Priority support via screen sharing and video chat, Dedicated Customer Success Manager and Solutions Engineer on Business plan | Community support on the Individual plan, Priority support on the Teams plan, Dedicated support channels and SLA commitments on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2012 | — |
| Headquarters | Lisbon, Portugal | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Series B · $28M raised | Seed · $8M raised |
| Best for | Fast-paced engineering teams building fast-growing codebases | Developers and teams who want an open-source AI coding agent that works with their own model keys or local models across IDE, CLI and cloud. |
Plans side by side
Codacy
Developer$0per dev/mth, free forever
Team$18per dev/mth, yearly billing (from $21 monthly)
BusinessCustomcustom, per dev/mth, billed annually
Kilo Code
Free$0free for individuals; usage billed separately
Teams$15user/month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Codacy
Profile in progress.
Kilo Code
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codacy vs Kilo Code”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codacy-vs-kilo-code, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.