CodacyCode Quality & Security for AI-Assisted Engineering
vs
QodoAI code review and governance for teams shipping AI-written code
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Codacy vs Qodo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qodo is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 9.4 versus 0.4 for Codacy.
Choose Codacy if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Qodo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.4 vs 0.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (46% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Codacy | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 9.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #35 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 3.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 15 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 46% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Codacy 0pp · Qodo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qodo leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CodacyQodo
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Codacy ranked higher
0Qodo ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Codacy | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo | $30 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted | Single-tenant SaaS or on-premises |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Standard support via email and in-app chat, Priority support via screen sharing and video chat, Dedicated Customer Success Manager and Solutions Engineer on Business plan | Standard support: documentation, in-product help and ticket-based response, Priority support, dedicated SLA and assigned team member on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2012 | — |
| Headquarters | Lisbon, Portugal | New York, NY, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B · $28M raised | Series B · $120M raised |
| Best for | Fast-paced engineering teams building fast-growing codebases | Engineering teams shipping code at the speed AI writes it and needing consistent review and governance |
Plans side by side
Codacy
Developer$0per dev/mth, free forever
Team$18per dev/mth, yearly billing (from $21 monthly)
BusinessCustomcustom, per dev/mth, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Codacy
Profile in progress.
Qodo
- Strong free tooling for code review, test generation, and bug detection inside the IDE
- Exceptional context-aware autocomplete and unit test generation on the free tier
- Automated test generation and pull request review that helps prevent breaking changes
- Offers a free trial, reportedly without a credit card
- Strong choice for review and testing controls in privacy and governance needs
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codacy vs Qodo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codacy-vs-qodo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.