CodacyCode Quality & Security for AI-Assisted Engineering
vs
TabbyOpensource, self-hosted AI coding assistant
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Codacy vs Tabby
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Codacy is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 0.4 versus 0.3 for Tabby.
Choose Codacy if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.4 vs 0.3)
- You want a lower entry price ($18 vs $19)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
Choose Tabby if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- privacy and self-hosting
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Codacy | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #35 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Codacy 0pp · Tabby 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Codacy leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CodacyTabby
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Codacy ranked higher
0Tabby ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Codacy | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted | Self-hosted on-premises or in the cloud, with no external DBMS or cloud services required |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) | — |
| Support | Standard support via email and in-app chat, Priority support via screen sharing and video chat, Dedicated Customer Success Manager and Solutions Engineer on Business plan | Community Slack, Email support, Dedicated Slack channel |
| Founded | 2012 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Lisbon, Portugal | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B · $28M raised | Seed · $7M raised |
| Best for | Fast-paced engineering teams building fast-growing codebases | Developers and teams who want a self-hosted, open-source alternative to GitHub Copilot and need to keep control of their code and infrastructure. |
Plans side by side
Codacy
Developer$0per dev/mth, free forever
Team$18per dev/mth, yearly billing (from $21 monthly)
BusinessCustomcustom, per dev/mth, billed annually
Tabby
Community$0per month, free open source
Team$19per seat per month
EnterpriseCustomcustom, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Codacy
Profile in progress.
Tabby
- privacy and self-hosting
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codacy vs Tabby”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codacy-vs-tabby, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.