Codefresh vs Docker
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Docker is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 17.2 versus 3.6 for Codefresh, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Codefresh if…
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 2 coverage
Choose Docker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.2 vs 3.6)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 attestation for Docker Hub and Scout or ISO 27001 certification or ISO 27701 certified privacy program coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Broad support for Docker and Kubernetes workflows
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Codefresh | Docker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.6% | 17.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #19 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 4.5% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 27 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 6% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Codefresh 0pp · Docker 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Docker leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Codefresh | Docker |
|---|---|---|---|
| What features matter most in a CI/CD tool? | ChatGPT | #14 | #4 |
| What should a CI/CD tool integrate with? | Perplexity | #10 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Codefresh | Docker |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $11 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Local and Docker-managed cloud |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 2 | SOC 2 Type 2 attestation for Docker Hub and Scout, ISO 27001 certification, ISO 27701 certified privacy program |
| Support | Community support (Free), 8/5 support, 9–5pm weekdays (Professional), 24/7 support (Enterprise), Premium support (add-on) | Community forums and Community Slack, Support tickets with 5, 2 or 1 business day response SLAs by plan, Premium Support and TAM add-on with 24x7 response |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Reported raise (headline only, unverified) · $204M raised | Funding round |
| Best for | Enterprise teams deploying frequently across many environments, applications, customers or Kubernetes clusters | Individual developers, growing teams and large enterprises that run AI coding agents and need security teams to govern them |
Plans side by side
Codefresh
Pricing not available.
Docker
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Codefresh
Profile in progress.
Docker
- Broad support for Docker and Kubernetes workflows
- Reliable for containerized, Docker-based workflows
- Docker layer caching
- Extra storage fees for Docker layers and images
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codefresh vs Docker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codefresh-vs-docker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.