Codefresh vs Harness
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Harness is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 12.3 versus 3.6 for Codefresh, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.
Choose Codefresh if…
- You need SOC 2 coverage
Choose Harness if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12.3 vs 3.6)
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or FedRAMP 20x Class A or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Strong enterprise release governance
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Codefresh | Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.6% | 12.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #19 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 3.7% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 52% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Codefresh 0pp · Harness 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Harness leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Codefresh | Harness |
|---|---|---|---|
| What features matter most in a CI/CD tool? | ChatGPT | #14 | #13 |
| What features matter most in a CI/CD tool? | Perplexity | #2 | #4 |
| Best CI/CD tool for enterprise | Perplexity | #13 | #6 |
| Official website of the top CI/CD tool vendors | Perplexity | #18 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Codefresh | Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Harness platform with a Harness Delegate that runs inside the customer's VPC or cluster; a self-managed platform is available as an Enterprise add-on. |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 2 | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, FedRAMP 20x Class A, GDPR |
| Support | Community support (Free), 8/5 support, 9–5pm weekdays (Professional), 24/7 support (Enterprise), Premium support (add-on) | Standard support with a dedicated customer success manager (Essentials), Premier support and dedicated account manager (Enterprise), Community support (Free plan), Professional Services as an add-on |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Reported raise (headline only, unverified) · $204M raised | Series E · $570M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise teams deploying frequently across many environments, applications, customers or Kubernetes clusters | Enterprise engineering and platform teams that want CI, CD, security and cost controls on one governed platform. |
Plans side by side
Codefresh
Pricing not available.
Harness
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Codefresh
Profile in progress.
Harness
- Strong enterprise release governance
- Deployment safety and automated rollback
- Deployment verification and progressive delivery
- AI-driven pipeline optimization
- Analyst recognition as a strong continuous delivery vendor
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codefresh vs Harness”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codefresh-vs-harness, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.