CodeRabbit vs Sourcegraph Cody
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Sourcegraph Cody is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 1.2 for CodeRabbit, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose CodeRabbit if…
- You want a lower entry price ($24 vs $16,000)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 1.2)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free trial available for 30 days
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CodeRabbit | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #24 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 3.3% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 16 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CodeRabbit 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Sourcegraph Cody leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | CodeRabbit | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best AI coding assistant tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #13 | #14 |
| Top AI coding assistant options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #7 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CodeRabbit | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $24 per seat / mo | $16,000 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Deployment | SaaS; self-hosting and company-selected SaaS regions available on Enterprise | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Enterprise plan: support SLA, dedicated customer success, and technical enablement | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support |
| Founded | 2023 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | San Francisco, California, US |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series C · $200M raised | Later-stage deal · $225M raised |
| Best for | Engineering teams merging high volumes of pull requests, including AI-generated code from coding agents | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases |
Plans side by side
CodeRabbit
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CodeRabbit
Profile in progress.
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CodeRabbit vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/coderabbit-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.