Codex vs Sourcegraph Cody
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Codex is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 20.9 versus 7.7 for Sourcegraph Cody, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Codex if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (20.9 vs 7.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (64% vs 0% positive)
- Strong for autonomous coding tasks
- Frequently included in top AI coding shortlists
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free trial available for 30 days
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Codex | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 20.9% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #4 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 5.4% | 3.3% |
| Mentions this run | 28 | 16 |
| Positive in AI answers | 64% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Codex 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Codex leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
7 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Codex | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best AI coding assistant tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #4 | #14 |
| Top AI coding assistant options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #4 | #11 |
| Top AI coding assistant options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #4 | #11 |
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | Perplexity | #4 | #14 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | Perplexity | #4 | #15 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | AI Mode | #3 | #10 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | Perplexity | #2 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Codex | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $16,000 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted agent, with local CLI, IDE extension and desktop app surfaces. | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | — | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support |
| Founded | 2025 | — |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, California, US |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Later-stage deal · $225M raised |
| Best for | Software engineers who want an AI agent to handle coding tasks such as writing code and fixing bugs. | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases |
Plans side by side
Codex
Pricing not available.
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Codex
- Strong for autonomous coding tasks
- Frequently included in top AI coding shortlists
- Enterprise-scale engineering adoption
- Deterministic multi-step task execution for OpenAI-first teams
- Delegated engineering tasks, code review, and cloud or parallel agent workflows
- Appears less consistently in enterprise analyst lists
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codex vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codex-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.