Concourse CI vs GitHub
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GitHub is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 83.3 versus 0.6 for Concourse CI, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Concourse CI if…
- No licensing fees when self-hosted
Choose GitHub if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (83.3 vs 0.6)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Tailored ATO coverage
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Concourse CI | GitHub |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.6% | 83.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #30 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 12.3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 72 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 48% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Concourse CI 0pp · GitHub 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GitHub leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Concourse CI | GitHub |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which CI/CD tool has transparent pricing? | AI Mode | #5 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Concourse CI | GitHub |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Distributed as a single concourse binary, easy to run almost anywhere, especially with Docker. | Cloud service (GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and self-hosted GitHub Enterprise Server |
| Compliance | — | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Tailored ATO |
| Support | — | Community support (Free plan), Web-based support (Team plan), Premium support with 24/7 web and phone support and a 30-minute SLA on urgent tickets (Enterprise) |
| Founded | — | 2008 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | — | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | — | Round led by Sequoia Capital · $350M raised |
| Best for | — | Development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform. |
Plans side by side
Concourse CI
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Concourse CI
- No licensing fees when self-hosted
GitHub
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
- Native integration with GitHub repositories and pull requests
- Transparent pricing with a generous free tier
- Best default for teams already using GitHub
- High user satisfaction and review scores
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Concourse CI vs GitHub”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/concourse-ci-vs-github, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.