Skip to content
SlateIndex
Concourse CIConcourse is an open-source continuous thing-doer.
vs
SemaphoreThe CI built for coding agents: fast, affordable, and enterprise-ready.
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3

Concourse CI vs Semaphore

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Semaphore is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 6.4 versus 0.6 for Concourse CI, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Concourse CI if…

  • No licensing fees when self-hosted

Choose Semaphore if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.4 vs 0.6)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 coverage
  • predictable, transparent usage pricing
  • free full-functionality enterprise tier for small teams and startups

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Concourse CI Semaphore
Visibility score0.6%6.4%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in CI/CD#30#14
Share of voice0.2%1.9%
Mentions this run111
Positive in AI answers—40%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Concourse CI 1%

Concourse CI 0pp · Semaphore 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Semaphore leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
3.9%
AI Mode
1.7%
8.2%
Perplexity
0%
7.2%
Concourse CISemaphore

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0Concourse CI ranked higher
1Semaphore ranked higher
PromptEngineConcourse CISemaphore
Which CI/CD tool has transparent pricing? AI Mode#5#2

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionConcourse CISemaphore
Pricing model—Usage-based
Entry price—Free; paid from $0.003 / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentDistributed as a single concourse binary, easy to run almost anywhere, especially with Docker.Open source, cloud, hybrid or enterprise deployment
Compliance—SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022
Support—Free help with account setup, projects and Git integration, Paid Basic, Priority Response, SLA Standard and SLA Premium support plans, On-demand engineering access in blocks of hours
Founded—2009
Headquarters—Novi Sad, Serbia
Employees—11–50
Funding—PE round, Cypress Ridge Capital
Best for—Teams that want fast, low-cost CI/CD with pay-as-you-go pricing and the option to self-host open source.

Plans side by side

Concourse CI

Pricing not available.

Semaphore

Ubuntu ARM 2vCPU$0.003minute
Ubuntu ARM 4vCPU$0.006minute
Ubuntu ARM 8vCPU$0.012minute
Ubuntu x64 2vCPU$0.008minute
Ubuntu x64 4vCPU$0.015minute
MacOS 4vCPU$0.09minute
Self-Hosted (any machine)$0.003minute
Semaphore pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Concourse CI

  • No licensing fees when self-hosted

    Semaphore

    • predictable, transparent usage pricing
    • free full-functionality enterprise tier for small teams and startups
    • highest G2 review rating among CI/CD tools (4.7/5)
    • low-friction integration for GitHub repositories
    • scaling costs
    • complex matrix requirements
    • security track record concerns

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Concourse CI vs Semaphore”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/concourse-ci-vs-semaphore, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.