Contentsquare vs GoAccess
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Contentsquare is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 6.7 versus 0.7 for GoAccess.
Choose Contentsquare if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.7 vs 0.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 9001:2015 coverage
- Automatic event capture (autocapture) with no manual tagging
Choose GoAccess if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Contentsquare | GoAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.7% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #14 | #34 |
| Share of voice | 2.5% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Contentsquare 0pp · GoAccess 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Contentsquare leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Contentsquare | GoAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $49 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | — | Runs in a terminal on *nix systems or through a browser, and can run against an access log file or live log input. |
| Integrations | 115+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 9001:2015 | — |
| Support | AI-powered support on the Free plan, Priority support on Pro and Enterprise, Dedicated support and SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer success manager on Enterprise | — |
| Founded | 2012 | — |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | — |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | — |
| Funding | Series F | — |
| Best for | Digital teams at large enterprise and mid-market brands that want to understand and improve journeys across web and apps. The Free plan suits first-time users, and Enterprise suits large teams. | System administrators who need fast visual statistics and security monitoring from web server logs, including over SSH. |
Plans side by side
Contentsquare
GoAccess
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Contentsquare
- Automatic event capture (autocapture) with no manual tagging
- Session replay and UX friction insights
- Strong G2 rating from many reviews
- Recognised market leader in digital experience analytics
- Free tier available for small projects
- Paid plans require custom quotes rather than transparent pricing
GoAccess
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Contentsquare vs GoAccess”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/contentsquare-vs-goaccess, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.