ContentsquareAI-first experience platform for every human and agent journey
vs
JuneThe new way to do product analytics (YC W21)
Comparison · Product Analytics · weekly run Nov 3
Contentsquare vs June
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Contentsquare is the stronger AI pick in Product Analytics: it has a visibility score of 11.8 versus 2.4 for June.
Choose Contentsquare if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (11.8 vs 2.4)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 9001:2015 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Automatic event capture (autocapture) with no manual tagging
Choose June if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Account-level simplicity for B2B SaaS companies past $1M ARR
- Suited to PLG startups lacking a data team
- Included in shortlists of leading product analytics vendors
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Contentsquare | June |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 11.8% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | up+2% | up+0.4% |
| Rank in Product Analytics | #8 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 4.5% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Contentsquare +2pp · June +0.3999999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Contentsquare leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ContentsquareJune
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Contentsquare ranked higher
0June ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Contentsquare | June |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $49 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud |
| Integrations | 115+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 9001:2015 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | AI-powered support on the Free plan, Priority support on Pro and Enterprise, Dedicated support and SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer success manager on Enterprise | — |
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 1–10 |
| Funding | Series F | Seed · $2M raised |
| Best for | Digital teams at large enterprise and mid-market brands that want to understand and improve journeys across web and apps. The Free plan suits first-time users, and Enterprise suits large teams. | — |
Plans side by side
Contentsquare
Free$0forever (up to 200k monthly sessions)
Growth$49month (from 7k monthly sessions; $39/month billed yearly)
ProCustomcustom
EnterpriseCustomcustom
June
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Contentsquare
- Automatic event capture (autocapture) with no manual tagging
- Session replay and UX friction insights
- Strong G2 rating from many reviews
- Recognised market leader in digital experience analytics
- Free tier available for small projects
- Paid plans require custom quotes rather than transparent pricing
June
- Account-level simplicity for B2B SaaS companies past $1M ARR
- Suited to PLG startups lacking a data team
- Included in shortlists of leading product analytics vendors
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Contentsquare vs June”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/contentsquare-vs-june, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.