ContentsquareAI-first experience platform for every human and agent journey
vs
Lucky OrangeLucky Orange gives you heatmaps, session recordings and more, plus Discovery AI to connect them into a direct answer.
Comparison · Product Analytics · weekly run Nov 3
Contentsquare vs Lucky Orange
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Contentsquare is the stronger AI pick in Product Analytics: it has a visibility score of 11.8 versus 0 for Lucky Orange.
Choose Contentsquare if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (11.8 vs 0)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 9001:2015 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Lucky Orange if…
- You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $49)
- You need GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Best for conversion optimization
- Basic free tier or trial options
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Contentsquare | Lucky Orange |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 11.8% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | up+2% | down−2.1% |
| Rank in Product Analytics | #8 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 4.5% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Contentsquare +2pp · Lucky Orange −2.1pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Contentsquare leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ContentsquareLucky Orange
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Contentsquare ranked higher
0Lucky Orange ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Contentsquare | Lucky Orange |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $49 / mo | Free; paid from $19 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Integrations | 115+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 9001:2015 | GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | AI-powered support on the Free plan, Priority support on Pro and Enterprise, Dedicated support and SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer success manager on Enterprise | — |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Overland Park, Kansas, US |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series F | Seed |
| Best for | Digital teams at large enterprise and mid-market brands that want to understand and improve journeys across web and apps. The Free plan suits first-time users, and Enterprise suits large teams. | Website owners and teams who want to see why visitors leave and what to fix first. |
Plans side by side
Contentsquare
Free$0forever (up to 200k monthly sessions)
Growth$49month (from 7k monthly sessions; $39/month billed yearly)
ProCustomcustom
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Lucky Orange
Free$0month
Launch$19month, paid monthly
Build$39month, paid monthly ($32/mo paid annually)
Grow$89month, paid monthly ($72/mo paid annually)
Expand$249month, paid monthly ($199/mo paid annually)
Scale$1,049month, paid monthly ($839/mo paid annually)
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Contentsquare
- Automatic event capture (autocapture) with no manual tagging
- Session replay and UX friction insights
- Strong G2 rating from many reviews
- Recognised market leader in digital experience analytics
- Free tier available for small projects
- Paid plans require custom quotes rather than transparent pricing
Lucky Orange
- Best for conversion optimization
- Basic free tier or trial options
- Among the strongest-reviewed product analytics tools
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Contentsquare vs Lucky Orange”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/contentsquare-vs-lucky-orange, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.