Skip to content
SlateIndex
ContinuePioneering open-source coding agent
vs
Sourcegraph CodyThe enterprise coding assistant to understand, fix, and automate your code
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3

Continue vs Sourcegraph Cody

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Sourcegraph Cody is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 1.7 for Continue, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Continue if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)

Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 1.7)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
  • Free trial available for 30 days

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Continue Sourcegraph Cody
Visibility score1.7%7.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Coding Assistants#22#12
Share of voice0.8%3.3%
Mentions this run416
Positive in AI answers33%0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Continue 2%

Continue 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Sourcegraph Cody leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3%
0.9%
AI Mode
1.3%
5.2%
Perplexity
0.9%
17%
ContinueSourcegraph Cody

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Continue ranked higher
0Sourcegraph Cody ranked higher
PromptEngineContinueSourcegraph Cody
Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant Perplexity#13#15

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionContinueSourcegraph Cody
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—$16,000 per seat / mo
Free plan—No
DeploymentOpen-source editor extensions and CLI, with self-hosted and local model use supportedSingle-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments
Compliance—SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001
Support—24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support
Founded2023—
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, USASan Francisco, California, US
Employees11–5051–200
FundingSeed (SAFEs), led by Heavybit · $5M raisedLater-stage deal · $225M raised
Best for—Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases

Plans side by side

Continue

Pricing not available.

Sourcegraph Cody

Enterprise$16,000year, minimum annual contract (starting at)
Sourcegraph Cody pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Continue

Profile in progress.

Sourcegraph Cody

  • Free trial available for 30 days
  • Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Continue vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/continue-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.