Sourcegraph Cody vs Tabnine
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Tabnine is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 16 versus 7.7 for Sourcegraph Cody, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free trial available for 30 days
Choose Tabnine if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16 vs 7.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 0% positive)
- You need GDPR or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 coverage
- Strong privacy and protection of proprietary code
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Sourcegraph Cody | Tabnine |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.7% | 16% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #12 | #6 |
| Share of voice | 3.3% | 6.3% |
| Mentions this run | 16 | 29 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Sourcegraph Cody 0pp · Tabnine 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Tabnine leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
11 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Sourcegraph Cody | Tabnine |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best AI coding assistant tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #14 | #10 |
| Top AI coding assistant options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #11 | #6 |
| Top AI coding assistant options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #11 | #7 |
| Which AI coding assistant has the best reviews? | Perplexity | #7 | #5 |
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | AI Mode | #7 | #4 |
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | Perplexity | #14 | #7 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | AI Mode | #7 | #6 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | Perplexity | #15 | #10 |
| Which AI coding assistant has transparent pricing? | AI Mode | #4 | #1 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | AI Mode | #10 | #6 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | Perplexity | #12 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Sourcegraph Cody | Tabnine |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $16,000 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments | SaaS, VPC, on-premises and air-gapped |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 | GDPR, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 |
| Support | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, US | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Later-stage deal · $225M raised | Series B · $55M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases | — |
Plans side by side
Sourcegraph Cody
Tabnine
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Tabnine
- Strong privacy and protection of proprietary code
- Air-gapped, on-premises, and local deployment options
- Popular with enterprise and regulated teams
- Straightforward flat-rate pricing
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Sourcegraph Cody vs Tabnine”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/sourcegraph-cody-vs-tabnine, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.