CoresignalData intelligence layer for AI agents
vs
RecruiterflowAI-native ATS and CRM for executive search, recruiting and staffing agencies
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Coresignal vs Recruiterflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Recruiterflow is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.1 versus 0 for Coresignal.
Choose Coresignal if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need Certified by the Ethical Web Data Collection Initiative coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Recruiterflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.1 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 1 or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Coresignal | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 3.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #73 | #30 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Coresignal 0pp · Recruiterflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Recruiterflow leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CoresignalRecruiterflow
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Coresignal ranked higher
0Recruiterflow ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Coresignal | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $49 / mo | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Data APIs, bulk datasets delivered as JSON or CSV, and a hosted MCP server. | SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 30+ |
| Compliance | Certified by the Ethical Web Data Collection Initiative | SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 1, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | Email, Account manager, Slack (higher-tier plans) | SLA-backed support, Dedicated implementation, Live chat with a rep, FAQ and help articles |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Teams building AI agents, sales tech, HR tech, investment, and market research workflows that need fresh B2B company, employee, and jobs data. | Retained, contingent and executive search firms and recruiting and staffing agencies that want AI tools alongside a full ATS and CRM |
Plans side by side
Coresignal
Free tier$0free
Mini$49month
Starter$199month
Pro$499month
Growth$1,000month
Premium$1,500month
Scale$3,000month
Elite$5,000month
Recruiterflow
Platform Plan$149per user / month
AIRA PlanCustomcustom pricing (contact sales)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Coresignal
Profile in progress.
Recruiterflow
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
- Priced at $119/user/month billed annually
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Coresignal vs Recruiterflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/coresignal-vs-recruiterflow, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.