CrateDBEuropean real-time analytics database for live operational data
vs
MarqoSmarter Search, Higher Conversion
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2
CrateDB vs Marqo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Marqo is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 0.7 versus 0 for CrateDB.
Choose CrateDB if…
- You need ISO 27001 (CrateDB Cloud on AWS and Azure) or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Handles massive time-series, IoT, and operational data in real time
- Strong for high-volume real-time analytics
- Horizontal scalability with SQL access
Choose Marqo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.7 vs 0)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | CrateDB | Marqo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #29 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CrateDB 0pp · Marqo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Marqo leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CrateDBMarqo
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0CrateDB ranked higher
0Marqo ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CrateDB | Marqo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $0.073 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | On-prem, at the edge, in public or private cloud, or fully managed on CrateDB Cloud or STACKIT. | Deployed via API or one-click integrations with commerce platforms |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 (CrateDB Cloud on AWS and Azure), SOC 2 Type II | — |
| Support | Development support (free plan), Basic support (included with dedicated plans), Premium support (optional) | Talk to a search expert, Book a 30-minute demo with a live proof-of-concept on your own catalog |
| Founded | 2013 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Vienna, Austria | San Francisco, California, USA |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed round (per Caplight, amount not stated) | Series A · $18M raised |
| Best for | Teams with high-volume, high-cardinality operational data, such as sensor, telemetry and event streams, who need real-time analytics, search and vector queries without ETL. | Enterprise retail brands with large product catalogs in fashion, beauty, electronics and home goods |
Plans side by side
CrateDB
Shared$0.073hour (starting)
Dedicated$0.246hour (starting, incl. basic support)
CustomCustomcontact us
Marqo
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CrateDB
- Handles massive time-series, IoT, and operational data in real time
- Strong for high-volume real-time analytics
- Horizontal scalability with SQL access
- Weaker than full transactional guarantees
Marqo
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CrateDB vs Marqo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cratedb-vs-marqo, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.