CrateDBEuropean real-time analytics database for live operational data
vs
turbopufferVector and full-text search built on object storage
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2
CrateDB vs turbopuffer
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
turbopuffer is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 4.6 versus 0 for CrateDB.
Choose CrateDB if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need ISO 27001 (CrateDB Cloud on AWS and Azure) or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Handles massive time-series, IoT, and operational data in real time
- Strong for high-volume real-time analytics
Choose turbopuffer if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.6 vs 0)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (Business Associate Agreement available) or GDPR-ready DPA coverage
- serverless vector and full-text search built on object storage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | CrateDB | turbopuffer |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 4.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #29 | #14 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 1.9% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CrateDB 0pp · turbopuffer 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
turbopuffer leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CrateDBturbopuffer
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0CrateDB ranked higher
0turbopuffer ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CrateDB | turbopuffer |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $0.073 / mo | $16 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | On-prem, at the edge, in public or private cloud, or fully managed on CrateDB Cloud or STACKIT. | Multi-tenant cloud on usage-based plans; single-tenant and bring-your-own-cloud (BYOC) deployments on the enterprise plan. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 (CrateDB Cloud on AWS and Azure), SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (Business Associate Agreement available), GDPR-ready DPA |
| Support | Development support (free plan), Basic support (included with dedicated plans), Premium support (optional) | Community Slack and email on all plans, Private Slack channel on higher plans, 24/7 support and 99.95% uptime SLA on enterprise |
| Founded | 2013 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Vienna, Austria | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada |
| Employees | 11–50 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Seed round (per Caplight, amount not stated) | Seed |
| Best for | Teams with high-volume, high-cardinality operational data, such as sensor, telemetry and event streams, who need real-time analytics, search and vector queries without ETL. | Teams building AI applications, semantic search or recommendation systems that need large-scale vector and full-text search at lower cost. |
Plans side by side
CrateDB
Shared$0.073hour (starting)
Dedicated$0.246hour (starting, incl. basic support)
CustomCustomcontact us
turbopuffer
launch$16month minimum usage
scale$256month minimum usage
enterprise$4,096month minimum usage (>= $4,096/month, 35% usage premium)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CrateDB
- Handles massive time-series, IoT, and operational data in real time
- Strong for high-volume real-time analytics
- Horizontal scalability with SQL access
- Weaker than full transactional guarantees
turbopuffer
- serverless vector and full-text search built on object storage
- high performance at a fraction of traditional costs
- cloud-native, cost-conscious design
- ranked among highest vendors in an industry ranking
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CrateDB vs turbopuffer”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cratedb-vs-turbopuffer, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.