Skip to content
SlateIndex
CrewAIThe Enterprise Agent Build & Runtime for the work your business runs on
vs
UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3

CrewAI vs UiPath

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

CrewAI is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 17.5 versus 3.5 for UiPath, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.

Choose CrewAI if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.5 vs 3.5)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (43% vs 38% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • Fastest path to a working multi-agent demo

Choose UiPath if…

  • You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
  • Fast implementation times compared with peers

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric CrewAI UiPath
Visibility score17.5%3.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Agents#7#28
Share of voice4.9%1.3%
Mentions this run309
Positive in AI answers43%38%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3CrewAI 18%

CrewAI 0pp · UiPath 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

CrewAI leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
15%
6.5%
AI Mode
27.6%
1.1%
Perplexity
10%
2.8%
CrewAIUiPath

Head to head in AI answers

4 engine answers name both brands

3CrewAI ranked higher
1UiPath ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCrewAIUiPath
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat tiers
Entry priceContact salesFree; paid from $25 / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentCrewAI cloud, customer VPC on AWS, Azure or Google Cloud, or fully on-premises (AMP Factory).Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped
Integrations1000+—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type IISOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5
SupportCommunity forum, Dedicated support with Slack/Teams channel, Support contact, On-site supportBronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum
Founded—2005
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CANew York City, NY, United States
Employees11–501,001–5,000
FundingSeries BIPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised
Best forEnabling business and technical teams to build agents while giving platform teams the control to govern them.Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform

Plans side by side

CrewAI

Basic$0
EnterpriseCustom
CrewAI pricing

UiPath

Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
UiPath pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

CrewAI

  • Fastest path to a working multi-agent demo
  • Strong for complex multi-agent and role-based workflows
  • Free open-source Python framework
  • Good for quickly prototyping multi-agent systems
  • Industry standard for pro-code multi-agent orchestration
  • Better suited to developers than nontechnical users

UiPath

  • Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
  • Fast implementation times compared with peers
  • Rated Exemplary by ISG
  • Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
  • Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “CrewAI vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/crewai-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.