DagsHubEverything you need to manage multimodal AI data & models.
vs
LangfuseOpen Source Agent Evals & Observability
Comparison · MLOps Platforms · weekly run Nov 2
DagsHub vs Langfuse
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
DagsHub is the stronger AI pick in MLOps Platforms: it has a visibility score of 3.5 versus 0.3 for Langfuse.
Choose DagsHub if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.5 vs 0.3)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- Structured annual pricing with yearly billing options on team tiers
- Recommended as a starting option for MLOps lifecycle coverage
Choose Langfuse if…
- You want a lower entry price ($29 vs $119)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or HIPAA-ready region or GDPR coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | DagsHub | Langfuse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.5% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in MLOps Platforms | #23 | #51 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
DagsHub 0pp · Langfuse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
DagsHub leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
DagsHubLangfuse
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0DagsHub ranked higher
0Langfuse ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | DagsHub | Langfuse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $119 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $29 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud hosting, with on-premise, VPC, and air-gapped installation on the Enterprise plan. | Langfuse Cloud in US, EU, Japan and HIPAA regions, or self-hosted under the MIT license |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA-ready region, GDPR |
| Support | Community chat and email, Priority support on the Team plan, Enterprise SLA and support | Community support via GitHub, In-app support, Private Slack or MS Teams channel on Pro and Enterprise plans, Named lead support engineer on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2019 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | — |
| Employees | 11–50 | — |
| Funding | Accelerator/incubator deal | Seed · $4M raised |
| Best for | Data science and AI teams that manage multimodal datasets, experiments, and models, from individuals building small applications to enterprises running high-scale workloads. | Engineering teams building LLM applications and AI agents that want open-source, self-hostable tracing and evaluation |
Plans side by side
DagsHub
Individual$0user/month
Team$119user/month (monthly); $99 billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
DagsHub
- Structured annual pricing with yearly billing options on team tiers
- Recommended as a starting option for MLOps lifecycle coverage
Langfuse
- Discounted cloud pricing for qualifying early-stage startups
- Well suited to evaluating and debugging LLM or agent behavior
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “DagsHub vs Langfuse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/dagshub-vs-langfuse, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.