Skip to content
SlateIndex
DatabricksUnified data, analytics and AI platform on an open lakehouse
vs
UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3

Databricks vs UiPath

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

UiPath is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 3.5 versus 3 for Databricks, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Databricks if…

  • You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or SOC 1 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
  • Lakehouse architecture combining data warehousing with data lake flexibility
  • Strong for machine learning, AI, and data engineering workloads

Choose UiPath if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.5 vs 3)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 35% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Databricks UiPath
Visibility score3%3.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Agents#30#28
Share of voice0.9%1.3%
Mentions this run69
Positive in AI answers35%38%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Databricks 3%

Databricks 0pp · UiPath 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

UiPath leads on 1 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3.7%
6.5%
AI Mode
2%
1.1%
Perplexity
3.1%
2.8%
DatabricksUiPath

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

2Databricks ranked higher
0UiPath ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionDatabricksUiPath
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—Free; paid from $25 / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentAvailable across all major cloud providersCloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped
ComplianceISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, SOC 1, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5
SupportTechnical support on request, Technical documentationBronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum
Founded20132005
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CANew York City, NY, United States
Employees5,000+1,001–5,000
FundingRound at $60B valuation, including secondary saleIPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised
Best forData engineering, data science, analytics and AI teams at startups and global enterprisesLarge enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform

Plans side by side

Databricks

Pricing not available.

UiPath

Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
UiPath pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Databricks

  • Lakehouse architecture combining data warehousing with data lake flexibility
  • Strong for machine learning, AI, and data engineering workloads
  • Top customer satisfaction ratings alongside Snowflake
  • Free trial and free Edition for learning
  • Discounts for annual prepaid commitments
  • Complex consumption-based pricing with no single fixed price
  • Best only when ML, Spark, or Python skills are central to the team

UiPath

  • Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
  • Fast implementation times compared with peers
  • Rated Exemplary by ISG
  • Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
  • Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Databricks vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/databricks-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.