Skip to content
SlateIndex
DiceWhere tech connects.
vs
PinpointThe ATS built for multi-stream hiring
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Dice vs Pinpoint

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Pinpoint is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.2 versus 0.3 for Dice.

Choose Dice if…

  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)

Choose Pinpoint if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.2 vs 0.3)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (40% vs 0% positive)
  • You need ISO certifications or SOC certifications or ISO 42001 (AI management standard) coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Dice Pinpoint
Visibility score0.3%3.2%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#69#26
Share of voice0.2%1.2%
Mentions this run17
Positive in AI answers0%40%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Dice 0%

Dice 0pp · Pinpoint 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Pinpoint leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0.9%
4.1%
AI Mode
0%
1.3%
Perplexity
0%
4.3%
DicePinpoint

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Dice ranked higher
0Pinpoint ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionDicePinpoint
Integrations—100+
Compliance—ISO certifications, SOC certifications, ISO 42001 (AI management standard)
Founded19902018
HeadquartersCentennial, Colorado, United StatesUnited Kingdom
Employees201–50051–200
Funding—Growth investment led by Expedition Growth Capital · $22M raised
Best forTech professionals searching for tech jobs, and employers hiring tech talent.Organizations running several kinds of hiring at once across locations, roles, brands and candidate groups.

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Dice vs Pinpoint”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/dice-vs-pinpoint, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.