Pinpoint vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 3.2 for Pinpoint, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Pinpoint if…
- You need ISO certifications or SOC certifications or ISO 42001 (AI management standard) coverage
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 3.2)
- You need more native integrations (270+ vs 100+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 40% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Pinpoint | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.2% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #26 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 40% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Pinpoint 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Pinpoint | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a recruiting platform for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #7 | #6 |
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #17 | #6 |
| Top recruiting platform options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #6 | #4 |
| Best recruiting platform with AI features | ChatGPT | #9 | #1 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | Perplexity | #17 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Pinpoint | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | 100+ | 270+ |
| Compliance | ISO certifications, SOC certifications, ISO 42001 (AI management standard) | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | — | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2018 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | United Kingdom | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Growth investment led by Expedition Growth Capital · $22M raised | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Organizations running several kinds of hiring at once across locations, roles, brands and candidate groups. | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
Pinpoint
Pricing not available.
Workable
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Pinpoint
Profile in progress.
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Pinpoint vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/pinpoint-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.