DockerRun AI agents and containers safely, anywhere.
vs
Platform.shThe software factory for AI-human workflows
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
Docker vs Platform.sh
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Docker is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 17.2 versus 0 for Platform.sh.
Choose Docker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.2 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 attestation for Docker Hub and Scout or ISO 27001 certification or ISO 27701 certified privacy program coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Broad support for Docker and Kubernetes workflows
Choose Platform.sh if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or PCI DSS Level 1 or ISO/IEC 27001 or HIPAA or FS Cloud coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Docker | Platform.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.2% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #7 | #43 |
| Share of voice | 4.5% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 27 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 6% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Docker 0pp · Platform.sh 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Docker leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
DockerPlatform.sh
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Docker ranked higher
0Platform.sh ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Docker | Platform.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $11 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Local and Docker-managed cloud | Multi-cloud, across five clouds and 14 regions |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 attestation for Docker Hub and Scout, ISO 27001 certification, ISO 27701 certified privacy program | SOC 2 Type 2, PCI DSS Level 1, ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA, FS Cloud |
| Support | Community forums and Community Slack, Support tickets with 5, 2 or 1 business day response SLAs by plan, Premium Support and TAM add-on with 24x7 response | Standard support: 4-hour best effort urgent-ticket response, included by default, Advanced support: 1-hour guaranteed urgent-ticket response, Premium support: 30-minute guaranteed urgent-ticket response |
| Founded | 2013 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Paris, France |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Funding round | Series D · $180M raised |
| Best for | Individual developers, growing teams and large enterprises that run AI coding agents and need security teams to govern them | Developers, DevOps engineers and platform teams that want to move faster with AI-assisted work while keeping human approval and cost control. |
Plans side by side
Docker
Docker Personal$0per user/month
Docker Pro$11per user/month
Docker Team$16per user/month
Docker Business$24per user/month
Platform.sh
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Docker
- Broad support for Docker and Kubernetes workflows
- Reliable for containerized, Docker-based workflows
- Docker layer caching
- Extra storage fees for Docker layers and images
Platform.sh
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Docker vs Platform.sh”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/docker-vs-platform-sh, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.