DockerRun AI agents and containers safely, anywhere.
vs
TeamCityCI/CD
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
Docker vs TeamCity
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Docker is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 17.2 versus 7.2 for TeamCity, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Docker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.2 vs 7.2)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 attestation for Docker Hub and Scout or ISO 27001 certification or ISO 27701 certified privacy program coverage
- Broad support for Docker and Kubernetes workflows
- Reliable for containerized, Docker-based workflows
Choose TeamCity if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 6% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- powerful CI/CD server for complex enterprise builds
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Docker | TeamCity |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.2% | 7.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #7 | #13 |
| Share of voice | 4.5% | 2.6% |
| Mentions this run | 27 | 16 |
| Positive in AI answers | 6% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Docker 0pp · TeamCity 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Docker leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
DockerTeamCity
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
3Docker ranked higher
0TeamCity ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Docker | TeamCity |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a CI/CD tool for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #9 | #12 |
| What are the best CI/CD tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #8 | #10 |
| Alternatives to the most popular CI/CD tool | ChatGPT | #6 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Docker | TeamCity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $11 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Local and Docker-managed cloud | On-premises, single-tenant cloud, or hybrid; TeamCity Cloud is offered as a hosted option. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 attestation for Docker Hub and Scout, ISO 27001 certification, ISO 27701 certified privacy program | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Community forums and Community Slack, Support tickets with 5, 2 or 1 business day response SLAs by plan, Premium Support and TAM add-on with 24x7 response | — |
| Founded | 2013 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Prague, Czech Republic (registered); Amsterdam (regional HQ) |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Funding round | — |
| Best for | Individual developers, growing teams and large enterprises that run AI coding agents and need security teams to govern them | — |
Plans side by side
Docker
Docker Personal$0per user/month
Docker Pro$11per user/month
Docker Team$16per user/month
Docker Business$24per user/month
TeamCity
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Docker
- Broad support for Docker and Kubernetes workflows
- Reliable for containerized, Docker-based workflows
- Docker layer caching
- Extra storage fees for Docker layers and images
TeamCity
- powerful CI/CD server for complex enterprise builds
- best for enterprise and hybrid or on-premises environments
- straightforward annual offer with two months free
- discounts usually negotiated rather than automatically applied
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Docker vs TeamCity”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/docker-vs-teamcity, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.