DuckDBSimple, feature-rich, fast and open source analytical SQL database.
vs
SingleStoreThe real-time database for AI, apps and analytics
Comparison · Data Warehouse · weekly run Nov 3
DuckDB vs SingleStore
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
DuckDB is the stronger AI pick in Data Warehouse: it has a visibility score of 9.9 versus 0 for SingleStore.
Choose DuckDB if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.9 vs 0)
- AI answers describe it more positively (37% vs 0% positive)
- Open-source, in-process analytical database
- Free and excellent for local analytics on small datasets
Choose SingleStore if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA or GDPR or CCPA or Privacy Shield or PCI DSS v4.0.1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | DuckDB | SingleStore |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 9.9% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Data Warehouse | #11 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 3% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 17 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 37% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
DuckDB 0pp · SingleStore 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
DuckDB leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
DuckDBSingleStore
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0DuckDB ranked higher
0SingleStore ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | DuckDB | SingleStore |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $0.99 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Embedded in-process, or client-server via Quack, from edge devices to servers with hundreds of cores | Managed cloud service on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, plus self-managed deployments and a bring-your-own-cloud option |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, Privacy Shield, PCI DSS v4.0.1 |
| Support | Support page on duckdb.org, GitHub issues | Self-support on the free tier, Standard Support on paid tiers, Talk to a specialist, Technical support request |
| Founded | 2018 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 11–50 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Spinout from CWI | Series F-2 (led by Goldman Sachs) · $558M raised |
| Best for | Developers and data engineers who want a fast analytical SQL engine embedded in an application or run on a laptop, edge device or server | Teams building real-time applications, analytics and AI features that need live data without copies |
Plans side by side
DuckDB
Pricing not available.
SingleStore
Shared$0free workspace
Standard$0.99hour (starts at)
BYOC StandardCustomcontact us
Enterprise$1.49hour (starts at)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
DuckDB
- Open-source, in-process analytical database
- Free and excellent for local analytics on small datasets
- Lightweight, local-first data engineering without massive cloud infrastructure
- Free tier and simple, predictable low-cost plans via MotherDuck
- Not suited to shared, high-concurrency application databases
- Less suited to large enterprise workloads
SingleStore
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “DuckDB vs SingleStore”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/duckdb-vs-singlestore, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.